11 important studies on AI and law - What are the capabilities of AI in the legal sector?

An overview of current research:

AI vs. humans

1. GPT-4 passes the bar exam (Katz et al, 2024).

The classic: The “ancient” GPT-4 passes the US Bar Exam. It remains disputed how well the AI actually performed.
https://lnkd.in/d-Tawyzf


2nd AI vs. Richter (Posner/Saran, 2025)

A complex case is submitted to both experienced judges and an AI system for a decision. AI is based more strictly on precedents, judges more closely on the personality of the defendant.
https://lnkd.in/dFM-nQng


3rd AI deployment in Shenzhen (Liu/Li, 2025)

Chinese courts use AI to write reasons for judgement. People still make decisions, but the study suggests that the content of decisions is also changing.
https://lnkd.in/d_mmbe7C


4. AI in law school

AI-assisted law (Schwarcz et al., 2025)
Law students not only work faster with advanced AI models, but also improve their quality.

https://lnkd.in/dAaMYPq2


5. KI writes law exams (Fan et al., 2025)

LLMs write 340 German and English-language law exams - and then correct them as well. In German, the AI's do worse.
https://lnkd.in/d5JnuqEX
My meeting: https://lnkd.in/dtyUzfyz


6. Can AI take over the Prof. consultation? (Ouellette et al., 2025)

A patent law textbook is being fed into leading AI systems. On this basis, the AI answers 185 questions. But many answers are only “acceptable” or even incorrect.

https://lnkd.in/d3X9p_YW



7. Social perception objection rejected! (Schneiders et al., 2025)

Laypeople prefer AI-generated legal advice over that from lawyers — if they don't know the origin.

https://lnkd.in/dUm_qZvv


8. AI instead of state courts (Kieffaber et al., 2025)

Start-up founders present the concept of a completely AI-based arbitration court as an alternative to state courts.
https://lnkd.in/dwD-wQTb


Limits and risks
9. AI and critical thinking (Lee et al., 2025)

Study with 319 knowledge workers suggests: Higher trust in AI leads to less critical thinking.

https://lnkd.in/drihAyJA



10. RAG is not a panacea (Magesh et al., 2024)

Legal research tools with Retrieval AugmentedGeneration cannot completely prevent hallucinations.

https://lnkd.in/d4JmC-Hd


11. Big models, small effect (Humlum/Vestergaard, 2025)

Hardly any effects of AI chatbots on the labor market and at most modest increases in productivity — including injuristic occupations.
https://lnkd.in/dH6PfY9G

Source:

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7338803493190656000/

Dr. Sebastian Dötterl

Judge at the Munich Higher Regional Court